Friday, January 21, 2011

For Mon; our Unit 1 plan, paper 1 A & B

On the Blog (below) http://rothenbergcomp1101.blogspot.com/ is a newly revised Unit 1 schedule with reading & assignment due dates. Subject to change, as always.

If you don't have the book yet: On uLearn: PDF files of the reading for Monday: articles: Kron, Schneider; the intro to the book (Signs); and the intro to chapter 1 (Consuming Passions). You need Adobe Reader to view these: http://get.adobe.com/reader/ It is most likely already on your computer. You may have to right click on the file and choose Open With… You may have to Rotate the image of the text (View—Rotate).

On uLearn: Discussion Question—worth 5 points to Course Work; make a posting (around 200 words or more) and reply to a few others by Sunday evening.  

Discussion question: Discuss your home décor (after reading Kron’s essay) and what sort of signals you are sending with it—to yourself (your own self-image) and to visitors. And/or think of where you lived before coming to school, i.e., parents’ house, your bedroom; what symbols did you use in your bedroom to identify yourself? What are you trying to say about yourself through your possessions now, in your dorm rooms? Has it changed? Are you trying to construct a new identity now that you’re more independent from family? And/or how do you construct personal identity through your computer (desktop, etc), or social media sites?

Okay, so the plan for this unit (today until 2/7) is to focus on your own Identity. We will think about identity it two regards: the first concerns that identity you craft for yourself: the things you buy, the things you wear, your possessions in your home; this might also include your online “possessions”—who do you present yourself as on Facebook. Is it the same person you are amongst your family? Another important question to consider is who you are to other people, and how you fit (how you are categorized) into our corporate, media-dominated culture.

Our second way of examining our identity has more to do with the things we did not buy, the things with which we have less choice: race and ethnicity, for example, as well as gender and political inclinations. Of course, while we are born with our ethnicity, we can choose to highlight or downplay it; while most of us were born a male or female (sex), our sexual dispositions may vary widely (genders)—even if we consider ourselves straight, the degrees of masculinity or femininity (both social constructs) may be consciously altered. Our political leanings may be a product of out upbringing, or we may consciously relate them with our gender or race.

(Our readings thus cover a wide variety of issues across the chapters. We will be returning to the same ideas and theme throughout the semester.)

So I’d like us to produce two papers for Unit 1 (Paper 1-A and 1-B), each about 2.5-3 pages, one on each theme of Personal Identity. Your topics can and will vary widely, but the subject for each should be focused.

So, for 1-A, I might focus on my home décor: Brainstorming, I’d say I fashion my home with wooden furniture, oriental rugs, tons of plants; I prominently display my books on eight different bookcases. My electronics—stereo, TV, media like CDs, DVDs—are downplayed, often on lower shelves, obscured by plants. I have old typewriters, and lots of miniatures—silly or quaint or antique (which goes back to my childhood). I showcase antiques, old cameras, a stereoscope, pottery. I’m into sunshine coming through the windows, into openness without being stark, an  inviting, cozy, lived-in feel without being messy. I could go, but you’re probably beginning to think certain things about my place already, and about who I am—or rather, who I am trying to get others to believe I am. Not that I am lying about it, trying to hide something! Only that I am being conscious of my purposeful arrangement of objects in my personal space—and conscious that visitors will see certain things (and not others!). We often say when moving into a new place, “This thing looks nice here”…and it may be true, but what else are we saying?

So, after brainstorming, I’d then want to start thinking about what all this means: what kind of person do I want to portray? What kind of person might visitors see? I suppose I want to appear artsy, but not sleek NYC artsy; I want to appear well-read and sophisticated, but with a sense of humility, humor and a keen eye for smaller details, even silly ones. I want to show my appreciation for things of the past with antiques, which have an aesthetic and craftsmanship unparalleled by anything you can find at Target (although I shop at Target far too often!). Lots of my furniture and oriental rugs look expensive but most were from garage sales or they are hand-me-downs, so they are old, worn, mellowed with use. Even if I had the money, I wouldn’t want my home to appear expensive or glamorous (although walking around Ikea, I get very tempted).

Once you’ve analyzed your subject, work it into a personal essay, a sort of focused autobiography with a main claim—a statement you have arrived at through analysis and thinking and now want to prove. The claim in personal writing is often rather light (“lite”), just an overarching idea that unifies your observations and discoveries about yourself. For instance, my claim might be something like, “With my home décor I walk the line between several worlds: one world is of comfort, hominess, and congestion, the other of elegance, an artistic aesthetic, and openness. I want beauty, but I do not want visitors to have to take their shoes off; I showcase all the books I’ve conquered, but I do not want to appear pretentious.”

Or, I might compare my home décor now with my teenage aesthetic tastes: “Growing up, my walls were plastered with posters of Metallica and Kelly Bundy. Now, I will not adorn my walls with anything but original art.” The paper here might examine how and why my home décor changed.


Daily Schedule for Unit 1: Identity


Week
Day
In-Class Activities
Read by
this date
Assignments Due; Notes





1
1/10


Snow Day, classes canceled


1/12



Snow Day, classes canceled


1/14
Review Syllabus


Last day late registration

Find Saunders’s “The Braindead Megaphone” on uLearn and read for Friday

Purchase texts
2
1/17



MLK Day, no class


1/19
 Discuss Saunders’s “The Braindead Megaphone”



“The Braindead Megaphone”


1/21
Discuss method of text

Discuss Barthes’ “Toys” (handout)

Signs: Intro to book
PDF available on uLearn



3
1/24
Discuss reading

Unit 1-A: Identity
Possessions, contrived appearances


FW: pre-writing techniques, etc.
Familiarize yourself with: Writers Reference Section C (Composing) pgs. 3-64

Signs: Consuming Passions 75-85
PDF available on uLearn


Kron, “The Semiotics of Home Décor” p. 119
PDF available on uLearn

Schneider, “Frumpy or Chic?” p. 139
PDF available on uLearn




1/26


Signs: 2 essays TBA

Twitchell, “What We Are to Advertisers” p. 192

Goewey, “Careful, You May Run Out of Planet” p. 147

Writer’s Reference 67-77 (summary and analysis)



1/28



Williams, “Enough about You” p. 449

Simpson, “Multitasking State of Mind” p. 469


Signs: Writing about Popular Culture (p. 33-67) Read over weekend for your first paper

Summary & Analysis of any one essay read thus far; use Hacker’s 67-77 to accomplish this (600 words)

4
1/31
Unit 1-B: Identity

Politics, gender, race, ethnicity





Brooks, “One Nation, Slightly Divisible” p.  487


Due: paper 1-A

Use Signs: Writing about Popular Culture section


2/2


Mayer, “The New Sexual Stone Age” p. 312

Devon, “Gender Role Behaviors and Attitudes” p. 567


2/4



Cahill, “The Case for Marriage Equality” p. 586

Tannen, “There is No Unmarked Woman” p. 620





5
2/7


Braxton “Hollywood BBFs 4-Ever” p. 667

Bernstein, “Goin’ Gangsta, Choosin’ Cholita” p. 691





2/9
Unit 2:


Due: paper 1-B (will have read 6 essays for paper)

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Jan 19

Good discussion today in both classes! We're off to a great start. We'll try to finish up Saunders's "The Braindead Megaphone" on Fri as well as some other stuff (see below). 

I've edited our daily schedule below--nothing major, but keep an eye on it this semester to have a sense of where we're going. 

The TBA essays we'll read in Signs: I hope to have a complete list for unit 1 up over the weekend.

The following appears on uLearn, too:

Read Signs of Life pgs. 1-21

Some reading questions/writing prompts to jot down in your journal for Fri discussion:

Among the annotations (notes) you make in and around the text, underline a few lines that seem really important or eye-opening to you. Note, too, where you were confused.

The "You Decade": good or bad? Obviously, good or bad doesn't say much, but what is your gut reaction to the authors' claim that the traditional top-down nature of media/entertainment has been turned around by our ability, via high-technology, to contribute to the media/entertainment enterprise? Think of places where you can contribute--for instance, online commenting on articles or videos. Or citizen (participatory, or street) journalism. Or voting on American Idol. Do these benefit our national conversations, or are the floodgates open too wide, allowing too many idiots and "braindead megaphones" into the chat rooms? 

Think about our culture, according to the authors: "Corporate rather than communal, it is creative rather than conservative, but its creativity is tied to commodification, turning entertainment into a commodity to be sold alongside all the other products in a consumer society (4)." Have you ever thought of your entertainment like this? 

"(I)n the kind of mass consumer society in which we live, we are, in effect, constantly being trained to be the sort of passive consumers that keep the whole consumer-capitalist system going" (6). Agree or disagree? How are we being trained? Does this ring any bells with "The Braindead Megaphone"?

Concerning the example on 12 about popular shows in the 1950s, can you think of any shows nowadays that claim to, but actually do not, reflect reality--or that offer a distorted view of reality? In the 1950s shows, a patriarchal system was being served. Whose interests are being served by your example? What kind of signs or systems are being enforced? 
Can you think of any "cultural myths" as explained on 18?    

Friday, January 14, 2011

reading and journal response

The following announcement is on uLearn; find the reading on uLearn:


For Wed Jan 19:

Print out and read Saunder's "The Braindead Megaphone," found under Course Content (uLearn). Mark up the text as you read, for ex, underlining passages you like, circling passages you don't understand, commenting where you have something to say (this is called annotating the text). This helps you prepare for class discussion; without annotation, we might forget our thoughts on the text by the time class rolls around, or lose key lines we wanted to comment on, etc. 

Come prepared to discuss the following things (we'll call it your first "Journal Response," so write some thoughts on these questions in your journal--again, for you to prepare for discussion):

What is Saunders's central idea (aka Main Claim, aka Thesis)?

What are some examples he uses to support his main claim? 

How does Saunders's convey his claim to us, the readers? What are some techniques he uses? For ex, is his voice sarcastic, humorous, glib, angry? Does he use big academic words? Is he talking down to us? Does he use lots of emotion? Does he use fancy tricks? Is he deceptive or honest, clear or confusing? Can you find any rhetorical strategies? Thinking about these kinds of questions is called rhetorical analysis. 

Rhetorical analysis: To analyze the rhetoric of a text is to figure out how it persuades its readers--not what it is attempting to persuade them of, but how it goes about accomplishing that task. Nor is rhetorical analysis directly concerned with whether the text's assertions are correct. With the ability to understand how you are persuaded, you are less vulnerable to manipulation.

After you have identified Saunders's main claim and worked out how he is trying to persuade us, jump in and evaluate his essay.

With what parts do you agree and disagree? Where was is argument strong, weak?

Can you think of any other types of Braindead Megaphones out there in the world? List a few you find relevant. 

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Another snow day

Looks like we won't be meeting on Wednesday. See you Friday! 

Monday, January 10, 2011

Welcome to Comp 1101

Hello All, 


If all goes well, I will be posting our daily course plans here. Since daily plans are subject to so much change, I thought this forum would be an easy place to check activity, i.e., what we're doing in class, what's due when, etc.


My goal is to (very soon) post a daily plan for what we'll call Unit 1, which will cover about a quarter of the semester. As I get a feel about our progress, I can post a daily plan for Unit 2 or the rest of the semester. 


Best,


Pir Rothenberg